<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress.com" -->
<urlset xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
	xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9 http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9/sitemap.xsd"
	xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9"
	xmlns:news="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-news/0.9"
	xmlns:image="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-image/1.1"
	>
<url><loc>https://godfrey.law/2026/05/30/minnesotas-may-26-double-victory-constitutional-guardrails-hold/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>Godfrey&#039;s Law Review</news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-05-31T01:57:28+00:00</news:publication_date><news:title>Minnesota&#8217;s May 26 Double Victory: Constitutional Guardrails Hold</news:title><news:keywords>firearms preemption, Saint Paul ordinance, Single-Subject Clause, binary triggers, Minnesota Court of Appeals, Minnesota Gun Owners Caucus, omnibus legislation, Upper Midwest Law Center, Minn. Stat. 471.633, constitutional law, MCPPA, Ramsey County District Court, Second Amendment, Judge Leonardo Castro, municipal preemption, permit to carry, void for vagueness, 2024 omnibus bill, Minnesota firearms law, legislative procedure, politics, news, history, writing</news:keywords></news:news><image:image><image:loc>https://godfrey.law/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/godfrey039s-law-review-6a1b955060e12.png?w=150</image:loc></image:image></url></urlset>
